The last May 7, in Georgia, was executed a man sentenced to death, the first after the stop, which had nothing to do with the "moratorium" radicalbuonista , voted by the UN.
With the resumption of the course of justice and application of the maximum penalty have also resumed discussions for or against the death penalty.
In various forums on the Internet and are compared to each other and, as often happens, it transcends even under the pressure of emotional contingencies.
precisely in these situations it is necessary to stress the educational of the death penalty, when imposed on the basis of a regular and equally contradictory between the defense and accuses,
predetermined in the series when applicable,
when applied in a state that has made a clear separation between the judiciary and legislative / executive. The
regular and equal debate between the defense and accuses prevents a person is sentenced to death without having taken advantage of the opportunity of expressing their reasons and, if it is proclaimed innocent of having had an opportunity to rebut the thesis and the evidence the prosecution has the burden of proving the guilt (nice all-American formula: beyond a reasonable doubt ) because a cardinal principle of law is the presumption of innocence .
cases in which it can impose the death penalty must be strictly provided and coded first event for which one is on trial, it is necessary that criminals who are aware of the penalty to be incurred .
The separation of political power from trial stage is, finally, a feature necessary to prevent the abuse of a sentence that totalitarian regimes is not used to punish criminals, but to criminalize political dissent .
These three principles are all respected in the United States, where the death penalty is a penalty legitimately and properly applied to protect law-abiding citizens and their property . Log
it
With the resumption of the course of justice and application of the maximum penalty have also resumed discussions for or against the death penalty.
In various forums on the Internet and are compared to each other and, as often happens, it transcends even under the pressure of emotional contingencies.
precisely in these situations it is necessary to stress the educational of the death penalty, when imposed on the basis of a regular and equally contradictory between the defense and accuses,
predetermined in the series when applicable,
when applied in a state that has made a clear separation between the judiciary and legislative / executive. The
regular and equal debate between the defense and accuses prevents a person is sentenced to death without having taken advantage of the opportunity of expressing their reasons and, if it is proclaimed innocent of having had an opportunity to rebut the thesis and the evidence the prosecution has the burden of proving the guilt (nice all-American formula: beyond a reasonable doubt ) because a cardinal principle of law is the presumption of innocence .
cases in which it can impose the death penalty must be strictly provided and coded first event for which one is on trial, it is necessary that criminals who are aware of the penalty to be incurred .
The separation of political power from trial stage is, finally, a feature necessary to prevent the abuse of a sentence that totalitarian regimes is not used to punish criminals, but to criminalize political dissent .
These three principles are all respected in the United States, where the death penalty is a penalty legitimately and properly applied to protect law-abiding citizens and their property . Log
it
