Once again we are talking about an event that causes revolt of common sense. A Latin
a tobacconist, repeatedly robbed ( but if it was the first time, nothing would change ) was shot and killed a criminal , forcing the other two escaped.
Instead of chasing two criminals still at large, was indicted for murder (!!!) the tobacco itself. The citizens
are on his side and also surveys the spot of sky tg 24 are overwhelmingly opposed all'incriminazione the tobacconist who has reacted to brave robbery. Here is another example of
split, deep among the people on one side and the other one was deservedly with "s" small and, above all, a prosecutors who, not being elected by the citizens, not has an interest in hitting the crimes that affect the common perception of security, but convoluted as if we were in a classroom academic quibble, the skin of the law-abiding citizens, where it begins and where self-defense, however, the murder. We break
the delay and say without pretense, which is self-defense whenever defend their lives, their property and private property .
I would like to see judges as brave as incriminating tobacconists would react if they were entering their house criminals in order to steal their property and raping their wives and daughters.
The impression that is projected is that it seems there is more sympathy for criminals, for which you seek exemption from liability and the most recondite and improbable, not for citizens who have the courage to react. It's about time
were lifted restrictions that, even today, law-abiding citizens have in being able to defend his arm, of loved ones, property and private property, to compensate for the lack of objective state prosecutes those who respond (and should instead receive public praise) and not enough to pursue the criminals. Log
it
a tobacconist, repeatedly robbed ( but if it was the first time, nothing would change ) was shot and killed a criminal , forcing the other two escaped.
Instead of chasing two criminals still at large, was indicted for murder (!!!) the tobacco itself. The citizens
are on his side and also surveys the spot of sky tg 24 are overwhelmingly opposed all'incriminazione the tobacconist who has reacted to brave robbery. Here is another example of
split, deep among the people on one side and the other one was deservedly with "s" small and, above all, a prosecutors who, not being elected by the citizens, not has an interest in hitting the crimes that affect the common perception of security, but convoluted as if we were in a classroom academic quibble, the skin of the law-abiding citizens, where it begins and where self-defense, however, the murder. We break
the delay and say without pretense, which is self-defense whenever defend their lives, their property and private property .
I would like to see judges as brave as incriminating tobacconists would react if they were entering their house criminals in order to steal their property and raping their wives and daughters.
The impression that is projected is that it seems there is more sympathy for criminals, for which you seek exemption from liability and the most recondite and improbable, not for citizens who have the courage to react. It's about time
were lifted restrictions that, even today, law-abiding citizens have in being able to defend his arm, of loved ones, property and private property, to compensate for the lack of objective state prosecutes those who respond (and should instead receive public praise) and not enough to pursue the criminals. Log
it
