Iranian President Ahmadinejad has accused the United States (and the world western) hypocrisy for raising a ruckus on condemnation of Sakineh ( the woman sentenced - possibly to death by stoning - for adultery and complicity in the 'murder of her husband ) and be silent on the sentencing to death by lethal injection should be performed this evening, Teresa Lewis for the murder of her husband and a son. The Iranian position is
logic in terms of propaganda, instrumental in the moral and inconsistent in that substance.
The sentence which is subject Lewis is based on:
- a legal system independent from political and religious
- a forecast antecedent crime, the trial, the conviction;
- a contradictory parity between the prosecution and defense
- a system evidence which would exclude any kind of torture;
- a enforcement system that respects the dignity of the convicted and free from any unnecessary suffering.
The death sentence of Lewis thus corresponds to all the criteria that suggest a proper tool to:
- punishment of the offender
- deterrence against those who would be inclined to repeat the offense;
- defense of the company from re-offending.
clear to all the condemnation of Sakineh does not match at least four profiles needed:
- there independence from political power and / or religious
- is not equal between the prosecution and defense;
- it is not clear whether the confession was extorted under torture or not;
- if the execution was going through stoning not respect the dignity of the offender and avoid any unnecessary suffering .
But this last point belongs to the culture of the people it accrues to the conviction and, therefore, can be legitimate differences of sensitivity.
But substance, that is what matters to express your opinion, is that both cases see the death sentence for the murder of her husband .
A sentence that can be legitimate in the interests of social relations if any before the crime was committed.
are guilty or not?
This is the essential question, the only , be answered to determine if the sentence is correct or not .
E ', then an error compare the two cases, but even more serious is to deny the right to a state to execute a death sentence though respectful of the criteria and if the offender is found guilty in accordance with those principles. Why
a state has a duty, before the law to:
- punish
- deter from committing the crime
- defend the company from its recurrence by the same person .
Related : Sakineh But that is guilty or innocent?
Log it
logic in terms of propaganda, instrumental in the moral and inconsistent in that substance.
The sentence which is subject Lewis is based on:
- a legal system independent from political and religious
- a forecast antecedent crime, the trial, the conviction;
- a contradictory parity between the prosecution and defense
- a system evidence which would exclude any kind of torture;
- a enforcement system that respects the dignity of the convicted and free from any unnecessary suffering.
The death sentence of Lewis thus corresponds to all the criteria that suggest a proper tool to:
- punishment of the offender
- deterrence against those who would be inclined to repeat the offense;
- defense of the company from re-offending.
clear to all the condemnation of Sakineh does not match at least four profiles needed:
- there independence from political power and / or religious
- is not equal between the prosecution and defense;
- it is not clear whether the confession was extorted under torture or not;
- if the execution was going through stoning not respect the dignity of the offender and avoid any unnecessary suffering .
But this last point belongs to the culture of the people it accrues to the conviction and, therefore, can be legitimate differences of sensitivity.
But substance, that is what matters to express your opinion, is that both cases see the death sentence for the murder of her husband .
A sentence that can be legitimate in the interests of social relations if any before the crime was committed.
are guilty or not?
This is the essential question, the only , be answered to determine if the sentence is correct or not .
E ', then an error compare the two cases, but even more serious is to deny the right to a state to execute a death sentence though respectful of the criteria and if the offender is found guilty in accordance with those principles. Why
a state has a duty, before the law to:
- punish
- deter from committing the crime
- defend the company from its recurrence by the same person .
Related : Sakineh But that is guilty or innocent?
Log it
0 comments:
Post a Comment