few days ago, an entrepreneur Aversa, was shot and killed an immigrant who, with an accomplice, had violated his private property and was approaching the house to carry out a robbery or worse.
A judge placed him under house arrest suspect of murder and luckily the magistrate freed him .
Again a few days ago came the verdict against the tobacco who had shot a robber in 2003: it was (!!!) sentenced to one year and eight months imprisonment and it went well because the prosecutor had sought against him, even nine years and six months (I'd like to know what would have demanded against the robber survived! probably much less, Indeed I understand that this is already free ...).
Two episodes that tell us how distorted the concept of justice is how the gap between popular sentiment and the practice of judges .
Just the difference between popular sentiment and the decisions and requests of prosecutors is the best advertisement for the direct election of
pm With the popular election the prosecutor will stop theorizing and the People that would fall between to represent and interpret the feelings and needs which must , guaranteeing the security, now, does not exist. But
are episodes that also tell us what we must revitalize an old horse di battaglia della Lega (e ancor prima dell’Msi, quando i missini facevano i missini e non i “moderati”) circa la legittima difesa .
Legittima difesa che è anche uno dei pilastri su cui si regge la tutela della proprietà privata come bene fondamentale e diritto essenziale dell’individuo.
Nel 2005 fu parzialmente modificata la disciplina della legittima difesa , alla luce dell’insistenza con la quale i magistrati continuano a perseguire chi si difende – neanche fosse lui i l criminale e non quello che aveva tentato la rapina – è necessario che venga ancor più chiarita la impunibilità di chi reagisce aggressors , infringement of private property, a threat to their safety, their family members. But it is also necessary
a second pillar: revision of the law on firearms .
A revision that would allow law-abiding citizens who have done military service or have obtained special approval to use weapons, you can buy, keep and bear arms in the house without giugulatorie subject to the regulations, without, it seems, purpose to benefit the criminal and penalize law-abiding citizens.
E 'useless legalize rounds, if he is obliged to patrol the disarmed the slums.
's time to make a change in crime , with the cooperation between police and citizens and the voluntary participation but direct them to the realization of a safe and orderly society . Log
it
A judge placed him under house arrest suspect of murder and luckily the magistrate freed him .
Again a few days ago came the verdict against the tobacco who had shot a robber in 2003: it was (!!!) sentenced to one year and eight months imprisonment and it went well because the prosecutor had sought against him, even nine years and six months (I'd like to know what would have demanded against the robber survived! probably much less, Indeed I understand that this is already free ...).
Two episodes that tell us how distorted the concept of justice is how the gap between popular sentiment and the practice of judges .
Just the difference between popular sentiment and the decisions and requests of prosecutors is the best advertisement for the direct election of
pm With the popular election the prosecutor will stop theorizing and the People that would fall between to represent and interpret the feelings and needs which must , guaranteeing the security, now, does not exist. But
are episodes that also tell us what we must revitalize an old horse di battaglia della Lega (e ancor prima dell’Msi, quando i missini facevano i missini e non i “moderati”) circa la legittima difesa .
Legittima difesa che è anche uno dei pilastri su cui si regge la tutela della proprietà privata come bene fondamentale e diritto essenziale dell’individuo.
Nel 2005 fu parzialmente modificata la disciplina della legittima difesa , alla luce dell’insistenza con la quale i magistrati continuano a perseguire chi si difende – neanche fosse lui i l criminale e non quello che aveva tentato la rapina – è necessario che venga ancor più chiarita la impunibilità di chi reagisce aggressors , infringement of private property, a threat to their safety, their family members. But it is also necessary
a second pillar: revision of the law on firearms .
A revision that would allow law-abiding citizens who have done military service or have obtained special approval to use weapons, you can buy, keep and bear arms in the house without giugulatorie subject to the regulations, without, it seems, purpose to benefit the criminal and penalize law-abiding citizens.
E 'useless legalize rounds, if he is obliged to patrol the disarmed the slums.
's time to make a change in crime , with the cooperation between police and citizens and the voluntary participation but direct them to the realization of a safe and orderly society . Log
it
0 comments:
Post a Comment