Per la seconda volta , l’onu ha stabilito una moratoria contro la pena di morte.
Per la seconda volta l’onu, con la partecipazione di una pletora di piccole nazioni, spesso governate da tirannelli that change every six months, claims the right to interfere with the judicial system of a nation.
For the second time the UN did not even make the effort to distinguish between the states (USA, Japan) that impose the death penalty after a rigorous process in which they are assured the right of defense, punishing criminals Based on laws already in force the offense and those states (China, Cuba, Iran, North Korea) that use the death penalty for hitting political opponents.
And this is precisely the point that lose moral force to the UN moratorium, making only a tool by those who seem to have more to heart the fate of the criminals who do not self-punishment claimed by relatives of the victims, the penalty for a crime deterrent effect of a sentence is proportionate, fair and fast.
A state fair, that is a friend of its citizens, it is also seen by a judicial system not abusive, not ideological, but intended to do quick justice to those who have violated the fundamental principles of civilized living , withholding a life innocent.
why, despite all the moratoriums were also proclaimed that then you get any serious faults tolerating the suppression of the weak and helpless or left free to move with impunity and protecting terrorists, ruthless killers, the death penalty will remain in the consciousness of Civilians as the most appropriate sanction to hit the perpetrators of specific, heinous crimes and to protect the safety of all against the possibility that a subsequent criminal behavior off his more innocent lives. Log
it
Per la seconda volta l’onu, con la partecipazione di una pletora di piccole nazioni, spesso governate da tirannelli that change every six months, claims the right to interfere with the judicial system of a nation.
For the second time the UN did not even make the effort to distinguish between the states (USA, Japan) that impose the death penalty after a rigorous process in which they are assured the right of defense, punishing criminals Based on laws already in force the offense and those states (China, Cuba, Iran, North Korea) that use the death penalty for hitting political opponents.
And this is precisely the point that lose moral force to the UN moratorium, making only a tool by those who seem to have more to heart the fate of the criminals who do not self-punishment claimed by relatives of the victims, the penalty for a crime deterrent effect of a sentence is proportionate, fair and fast.
A state fair, that is a friend of its citizens, it is also seen by a judicial system not abusive, not ideological, but intended to do quick justice to those who have violated the fundamental principles of civilized living , withholding a life innocent.
why, despite all the moratoriums were also proclaimed that then you get any serious faults tolerating the suppression of the weak and helpless or left free to move with impunity and protecting terrorists, ruthless killers, the death penalty will remain in the consciousness of Civilians as the most appropriate sanction to hit the perpetrators of specific, heinous crimes and to protect the safety of all against the possibility that a subsequent criminal behavior off his more innocent lives. Log
it
0 comments:
Post a Comment